Friday, January 14, 2022

THE AMERICAS

 

13        The Americas

 

 EUROPEAN DATES ABOUT THE TIME OF THE OLMEC

3,525   3,647                          Thera Eruption   Destruction of Minoans

3500                                        Olmec: S. Mexico  1500 BC to 400 BC

3,447                                       Shekinah   A Deluge

3,341                                       King Tutankamen Egypt   R1b1a2 haplotype well established

3,200                                       Rise of Celts  Urnfield Culture central Europe

3,200                                       End of Bronze Age Europe     Drought Hatti, Wars, migrations, raiding, drop in trade

3,200                                       Mediterranean Sea Peoples  Origins Sardinia, Anatolia, Greece, raided Levant, Egypt

So the Olmec or Ti people made these huge heads and the standard history is they appeared about 3,500 years ago complete with writing system, astronomy, huge stoneworks and greatly more than just the subsistence level.  But what about Hueylatlaco?  Academics have been trying to ruin careers over the dating of stone tools found at the Hueylatlaco site in Mexico, but I prefer to go with a real scientist and his determination.  It is difficult to contradict. 

Biostratigraphic researcher Sam VanLandingham has published two peer-reviewed analyses that confirm the earlier findings of ca. 250,000ybp for the tool-bearing strata at Hueyatlaco. His 2004 analysis found that Hueyatlaco samples could be dated to the Sangamonian Interglacial period (ca. 80,000 to 220,000ybp) by the presence of multiple diatom species, one of which first appeared during this era and others that became extinct by the era's end.[9] VanLandingham's 2006 paper[10] refined and re-confirmed his 2004 findings.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hueyatlaco

Tools found in the strata are obviously old and of some refinement, not Eurasian but of the Americas. 

 

 

 

See the source image

Figure 123:  Tools found at Hueyatlaco  https://bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/archeohhist/archeohhist05.htm

 

Lest I be referred to as ‘fringe’, I prefer to look at all viewpoints before casting them out.  I remember the dating controversy Dr. Dillahay encountered with his work in South America, establishing a vastly earlier human presence than the entrenched academia in some instances.  I applaud Dr. Dillahay to this day!

Is the Hueyatlaco controversy another academic ambush?  I tend to think it is.  I hope the Mexicans take over the site and excavate it and find more.  They could make an exhibit in the big museum in Mexico City.  I read there was a skullcap found also.  I wonder where it went?  The Mexicans should demand it back. 

So now I think the Ti or the Olmec were there a long time before the ‘established’ academics said they were.  Their culture was too advanced and too prescient to be so young.  And who would have thought to make stone heads like these?

 

 

 http://www.ancient-wisdom.com/Images/countries/American%20pics/Head10.jpg

Figure 124:  Olmec Head   http://www.ancient-wisdom.com/mexicostoneheads.htm      This site has numerous photos of Olmec heads.    I recommend it highly.  

 

This next photo is of an item recovered from the Father Crespi collection based in Equador.  I do not think this particular item is a fake.  The leggings match the headgear of the colossal Olmec head.  This piece might be Pleistocene.  It shows a beardless man in an elaborate costume standing on a tiled floor with undecipherable symbols on each tile.  This is fine work, not the work of some faker. 

See the source imageFigure 125:  Father Crespi artifact   https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-americas/father-crespi-and-missing-golden-artefacts-001196

 

This man’s face is of another ethnic group than that of the stone heads, but definitely not Mayan either.  Some people feel the stone heads indicate African ancestry and others say the heads resemble those of living people in the area. 

The map shows the Olmec area of influence, which obviously began on the east coast of North America and spread to the surrounding areas, if current knowledge is correct.  If the Olmec were indigenous, was that the best area to live?  Abundant fishing and tropical fruits and back in the Pleistocene, a place to hunt and raise crops.  Were the Olmec traders?  In the Pleistocene, there was more land out there in the Caribbean and Florida was larger and I know those people traveled the Gulf of Mexico and spread their culture North to the Moundbuilders.  Were there communications with Africa?  I think there was, during the Pleistocene or the Bolling Allerod surely and probably long before that.  I think the commerce was suspended during the latter part of the Bolling Allerod, during the time when Atlantis is said to have disappeared and the sea between EurAfrica and the Americas became treacherous and technology became lost. 

https://www.crystalinks.com/mayanmap2.gif

Figure 126:  Olmec and Maya areas of influence  https://www.crystalinks.com/olmec.html

The map illustrates the known knowledge of the Olmec diffusion, which might be related to the Monte Alto culture in Guatemala which is said to be in existence before the Olmec.  The blending of Olmec and Maya characteristics takes place after the end of the Younger Dryas, maybe.  I think the dates for the Olmecs are far too compressed and that Pleistocene era megaliths reported in Mexico must be examined, Mitla in particular.

Theodore G Schurr and colleagues(1990) 'Both the North American Pima and the Central American Maya have high frequencies of the Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation containing the rare Asian RFLP Hine II morph 6 in conjunction with an Asian-specific 9 based pair deletion.' It appears that both the Pima and the Maya are genetically very close to the Polynesians. The arrival of these genes in America is believed to have been between 6-8,000 years ago, ruling out the possibility of Polynesian origins as Polynesians have only been in the Pacific for 2,200 years. A migration from America is far more logical.”   http://users.on.net/~mkfenn/page5.htm

I suggest that you go to that site and look at the genetic evidence detailed there.  This is definitely a new theory and the data they have is interesting and probably open to a variety of interpretations.  Maybe there were two kinds of Polynesians:  a northern group and a southern group.  And maybe the northern group did develop and spread south along the coasts.  Or maybe the Polynesians are the remnants of an ancient Pacific Rim Civilization.

Genetics does not lie but our data is incomplete.  Dr. Tokunaga has seen the evidence of Yonaguni and has studied the genetics. 

See the source image“HLA24-Cw8-B48, A24-Cw10-B60 and A24-Cw9-B61 were all commonly observed in Taiwan indigenous populations, Tibetans, Thais, Japanese, Orochon in North East China, Buryat, Man,Yakut, Inuit, Tlingit, Pima, Maya and Maori.' These findings further support the hypothesis that East Asia (Yonaguni/Taiwan area) was the dispersal point for all these cultures. This exodus 6-8,000 years ago coincides with the final rapid rise in sealevels at the end of the Ice Age which flooded this megalithic civilization on the island chain between Taiwan and Japan.”  Katsushi Tokunaga and colleagues. ‘Genetic link between Asians and Native Americans: Evidence from HLA genes and haplotypes' in Human Immunology 62 1001-1008 (2001).

 

This information appears to be a beginning salvo in an academic war about the origins of the Polynesians, with new theories seeking to prove the Northwest Coast of North America and now other American origins for the Polynesians.  I have long thought that the Beringia only migration theory was erroneous and narrow in scope. 

So do Olmec heads look like Polynesian kings or warriors?    

Figure 127:  Olmec Head https://www.lazerhorse.org/2014/10/02/olmec-incredible-mesoamerican-art/#

 

Here’s an old photo of a Polynesian woman to compare with the Olmec head:

See the source image

Figure 128:  Polynesian Woman   http://killpic.pw/Vintage-Topless-HULA-GIRL-Postcard-Polynesian.html

 

These kings wore helmets that look like battle helmets to me but I suppose they could be sports helmets.   It is said that the heads were the kings.   What did these people appreciate?  I know they made rubber balls and traded rubber.   Academia is obsessed with who came first and who discovered it when they should realize that many cultures back then were contemporaneous, just like today and they adopted each other’s foods and arts through trade and war just like today.  So if the Olmecs or Ti People looked like one group and the Mayans looked like another group, they eventually blended, possibly after some ancient war and migration, or extensive trade and migration. 

Olmec Head at the Xalapa Anthropology Museum

Figure 129:  Olmec Head  https://www.thoughtco.com/olmec-religion-2136646   Olmec Head at the Xalapa Anthropology Museum. Photo by Christopher Minster

Asian physical influence is obvious in the next photo.  The ‘baby’ looks Asian and is wearing an Asian style hat.  Gavin Menzes has several books out detailing the voyages of the early Chinese that are well worth reading. 

It looks like the early Asians left all kinds of calling cards like pottery styles and facial structures as they merged with the early indigenous cultures in the Americas.  I do think there was a Pacific Rim Culture during the Pleistocene and I think genetics is finally unravelling the truth.  Not all civilizations rose in the ‘old’ world, so that term should be dropped for lack of meaning.  Maybe the Polynesian civilization did arise in the Americas…

Maybe Chinese cultural attributes traveled with the groups that became the Maya, like hats and pottery styles and writing….Asian looking Olmec artwork is common and the Olmecs made small highly polished jade carvings similar to those of central China. 

See the source image Figure 130:  Olmec Baby  http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread992421/pg1

This babyish figure has an Asian face and the hat also looks Asian.  There are many figures like this in the Olmec art.   

This face looks like a combination of the Asian and Olmec possibly. 

 

Jadeite Olmec Mask (by Mary Harrsch (Photographed at the Dallas Museum of Art))Figure 131:  Olmec Adult https://www.ancient.eu/Olmec_Civilization/

 

 We see the merging of two civilizations in the Olmec art, one Austronesian and Polynesian in origin and the later one a migration from Asia, bringing the glyph style of writing, which soon predominated. 

Maya art glorifies rulers and a careful analysis of the facts you can glean from just looking at it shows their mindset and their judicial system. 

A stelae was found in Kaminaljuyu, a Mayan site in the isthmus closer to the Pacific Ocean.  Bound captives are shown and these captives show us something about them.  Two of the captives have a bone crosswise in their nose.  Every human figure has a different headdress or an ornament behind their heads and every figure but the top left have ear spools or large round earlobes.  Were these people all different status?  The hats mean something, like the police chief wears a differently decorated hat to signify status.   I know there are ancient examples of huge earlobes and ear spools all over Southeast Asia and in Equador and other areas in South America.   

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/Monument_65.jpg/800px-Monument_65.jpg

Figure 132:  Kaminalijuyu  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaminaljuyu#/media/File:Monument_65.jpg      By Jonathan Kaplan1938, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=50228388

Kaminaljuyu Monument 65, 290 by 200 by 33 cm

So the honchos sitting on the ‘thrones’ are obviously in control.  The captives look suppliant and scared but the honchos are flipping them off!  Look at the hands.  It’s the bird!  The origination of the ‘bird’.  I thought about it a while remembering the bird in Merida, Mexico City, Guadalajara, LA, Phoenix, Tucson, Albuquerque, El Paso, Houston, Brownsville……not that I was flipped off that many times.  I don’t remember the bird in Germany or France or Spain although it may have been there.   I don’t know about Asia or India or China.  I guess the ancient Maya and probably the Olmecs used the gesture, like a thumbs down given by Nero.  It’s strange how something like that lives on. 

Do these depict the conquering of the Olmec by the Mayans?  The faces look like different, one more Olmec and one more Mayan.  Was there a turncoat Mayan in the middle right figure? 

What do the headdresses signify?  I had a theory that the elaborate designs emanating from the craniums might be thoughts visualized.  It looks like the three ‘kings’ have the same hairstyle, luxuriant hair caught behind the neck in a band.  The suppliant Mayan looking figure does not have the same hairstyle as the ‘kings’.  This was an ancient war we can learn about if we think and observe the information available.  I love this stelae!   What is the meaning of the small sphere in front of the kings’ faces?

The spheres in front of the rulers’ noses might be related to the flaming pearl that indicated wisdom and strength when before a dragon’s face.

This unrestored pyramid is said to be built by the Olmec and is now said to be an ancient step pyramid but recent research has found megaliths in the area.  Check out Brian Forster’s Utube presentation on the Olmecs.  Mr. Forster knows megaliths all over the world and I take his word for it!  How many step pyramids have a megalith base? 

http://www.ancient-wisdom.com/Images/countries/American%20pics/laventapyramid1.jpg

La Venta Pyramid said to be an eroded rectangular step pyramid  33 meters high

Figure 133:  La Venta Pyramid  http://www.ancient-wisdom.com/mexicolaventa.htm

 

The Olmec pyramid at the Cantona site looks like those in the Canary Islands in restored condition.   I think there was another layer on top or it had pillars, like a Toltec pyramid.

Olmec pyramid restored, Cantona site 

Cantona Olmec Ruins MexicoFigure 134:  Olmec Cantona site  https://travelingted.com/2012/11/26/cantona-olmec-ruins-in-mexico-photo-essay/

 

Some look for an African origin for the Olmec but genetic studies suggest otherwise.  The shape of these pyramids might offer a clue as to ancient influences and trade ideas and possibly skilled workers migrating and imported, complete with architecture, like the Greeks.  It’s not a coincidence that they look alike, like the step pyramid of Saqqara in shape.  Stones or adobes? 

I look at photos of these things and count the steps and they usually appear to be 5, 7, 9, 11 steps, varying with the size.  Why not 4,6,8 etc.?  There is a significance to this sequence. 

The Saqqara Pyramid was said to be built about 2648 BC, a thousand years after the Olmec civilization.  Maybe some ideas came from the Olmec to the Africans.   

 

 

Saqqara Pyramid Egypt  4648 years old Standard Dating

See the source image

Figure 135:  Saqqara Egypt  https://www.tripadvisor.com/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g294202-d469330-i23945835-Step_Pyramid_of_Djoser-Giza_Giza_Governorate.html

The Canary Island pyramids look related and are said to be made by the Guanches of the Islands, a white group of people who resemble genetically the mainland Berbers in North Africa.  They are tall, blond people who sometimes have double rows of teeth, which reminds me of the Moundbuilders and various legends of giants in the Americas.  One source called them Cro-Magnon types like in Paleolithic Europe who settled in the Islands as the Sahara Desert dried out and became arid by 5000 years ago. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pyramids Canary Islands

See the source imageFigure 136:  Canary Island Pyramids  https://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-ancient-writings/did-celts-create-ibero-guanche-writing-canary-islands-008515

 

Some researchers do not think the Guanches built the pyramids and other researchers say the Guanches are actually Cro-Magnon man as he appeared in Europe.  The next photo shows a pyramid in ruins apparently related to the North African Berbers.  It appears to be constructed of shale like rocks but has the same shape with four visible layers.  I hope they are able to do archaeological work out there to find out more about it. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pyramids Berbers North Africa ruins

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhvYRkuXwjNC7hLaoWHk-dZlIztQXAfNhj_YQ3WpR7u5zeEooFFWtj5cT9G4wxVA1tmOy1Gt-tQcCJV7jdB3ortAQYC7XtZpgf_6yYQORKlJ4c-43w48_Swk-kydB3Cz4Dd3x1K/s1600/53398776_536235bb02_z.jpg

Figure 137:  North Africa eroded pyramid  http://www.portail-amazigh.com/2013/07/pyramides-berbers-berber-pyramids.html?m=1

 

To consider pyramids coming from the opposite direction, the Zapotec pyramid of Monte Alban shows characteristics of two kinds of pyramids, like Caral and like the Olmec.  This one looks like a combination of the two. 

What a cultural bloom that must have been, culminating in several ancient civilizations.

Monte Alban Zapotec  Standard dates 700 BC to 1521 when their civilization was conquered by the Spanish.

File:Piramide parte alta monte alban.JPG

Figure 138:  Monte Alban Zapotec Site   Author  Lsalgador82  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Piramide_parte_alta_monte_alban.JPG

 

 

El Tajin Mexico  Standard dating 600-1200 AD as a recent local empire

File:El Tajín Pyramid of the Niches.jpg

Figure 139:  El Tajin  Mexico  Ernest Mettendorf    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:El_Tajín_Pyramid_of_the_Niches.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tula Pyramid  Tula fell about 1150 AD

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a9/TulaSite117.JPG/1280px-TulaSite117.JPG

Figure 140:  Tula Mexico  By AlejandroLinaresGarcia - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=24484504

 

 

The next photo is of Kol Ker Cambodia, a step pyramid similar to those in the Americas and in the Canary Islands.  Mr. Buildreps has calculated the beginning age for Kol Ker foundations at 240,000 to 270,000 years ago.   Kol Ker and the reservoir are oriented at 15 degrees West of the current pole.   Koh Ker was capital of the Khmer Empire around 940 CE.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6d/0505280017PThompyramid.jpg/400px-0505280017PThompyramid.jpg  Figure 141:  Koh Ker Cambodia https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Koh_Ker  

 

Mayan Pyramid  Tikal, Guatemala  732 AD 

a steep-sided, stepped pyramid with a central staircase that rises from a flat, grassy area to a temple doorway at the topFigure 142:  Tikal Guatemala  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikal_Temple_I

Cambodian Pyramid looks like Tikal in Guatemala.  1000 AD

See the source image

 

Figure 143:  Cambodian Pyramid  https://keeperofthehome.org/12-things-my-children-learned-while-worldschooling-this-year/

 

The Olmec excelled in stone carvings resembling those of ancient Asia, possibly a remnant of that Pacific Rim Pleistocene civilization I believe existed.  Trade was probably extensive before the beginning of the Holocene although physical evidence is scant, artwork all along the Rim from Japan down the coast of Mexico has similar artwork to that of the ancient Japanese and the Northwest Coast Native Americans.

See the source image

Figure 144:  Olmec Figurine

http://www.antiques.com/classified_items.php?SeArChItEmS=&startrage=&endrange=&catid=380&GoPageNo=56

 

 

 

 

The next photo is of a bat bracelet, Shang Dynasty China, 1100 BC. 

c1100 B.C. Chinese Shang to Zhou Carved Russet Jade Bat Bracelet    Figure 145:  Bat https://www.paradeantiques.co.uk/china-ceramics-glass/oriental/chinese/c1100-b.c.-chinese-shang-to-zhou-carved-russet-jade-bat-bracelet

 

Pendiente nahualismo olmeca Figure 146:  Bat https://www.paradeantiques.co.uk/china-ceramics-glass/oriental/chinese/c1100-b.c.-chinese-shang-to-zhou-carved-russet-jade-bat-bracelet

 

 

 

A Monte Alto Guatemala sculpture that might be pre Olmec or something else entirely.

See the source image Figure 147:  Monte Alto Guatemala http://ajourneythroughguatemala.blogspot.com/2010/07/monte-alto-culture-key-to-understand.html

 

Who were the Olmec or Ti People?  I think the Ti were indigenous to the Americas from some 400,000 years ago and did not develop in isolation, but was part of a community of nations, sometimes more than others.  The most recent isolation has been since the beginning of the Holocene some 12,500 years ago due to some climate change issues.  The Olmec were very early in our known world, easily competing with other known sites as traders and disseminators of their genes and cultural knowledge throughout the world, not just in a limited domain.  Evidence lies in the pyramid formats, hairless dogs, genetic data and artwork that a Pacific Rim Civilization existed during the Pleistocene, the remnants of which were the Northwest Coast of North America Amerind civilization, the Jomon in Japan, the Valdivia Culture of South America, Caral, the Olmec, the Maya, and the Ollantetambo and Saksayhuaman megaliths in South America and no doubt others along the Chinese coast, the Phillipines and Southeast Asia.  The original Amerinds were in place as new migrants with new ideas began a settlement effort during the Holocene well after the sea levels rose.  The Olmec had ports on the Atlantic and Pacific sides and they may have been originally traders who settled in the beautiful region. 

The end of the glacial period was a time of trials for humanity, when populations were fluid and the coastlines were shrinking and territory was lost and probably fights broke out and people migrated out of necessity. 

Maybe the existing decimated populations of the Americas welcomed the new migrants, opened trade networks and began cultural exchanges or maybe they were conquered and their culture appropriated and blended with the new.  Some of the genetic signals appear to be quite old, and others are newer and more prevalent.   Look at the dogs!

Hairless Dog Xoloitzcuintli  Mexico

Mexican hairless dog - photo#28 Figure 148:  Zoloizcuintli  http://animalia-life.club/other/mexican-hairless-dog.html

Peruvian Hairless Dog

Curiosities You Must Know about the Peruvian Dog

Figure 149:  Peruvian Xolo  http://megamascota.hiperarticulos.com/peruvian-dog/

Chinese Crested hairless Dog

https://animalsbreeds.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Chinese-Crested-20.jpg

Figure 150:  Chinese Hairless    https://animalsbreeds.com/chinese-crested/

People travel and migrate with their dogs and the intermingling of civilizations mingles dogs. 

 

Standard Dates for these civilizations  

 

Name and Location                                                   Standard Date

 

Jomon: Japan                                                                                  14,500 BC  to 300 AD

Daxi   NW China                                                                             5000 to 3300 BC

Yangshao China                                                                             5000 BC to 3000 BC

Valdivia: coast Peru                                                                      3500-1800 BC  

Olmec: S. Mexico                                                                          1500 BC to 400 BC

Adena: Midwest USA                                                                   1000 to 200 BC

Chavin de Huantar:                                                                       900 BC  to 200 BC

Maya: MesoAmerica                                                                    350BC to 1540 AD

Hopewell: Midwest USA                                                                         200 BC to 500 AD

Teotihuacan: C. Mexico                                                               100 BC to 550 AD

Moche:                                                                                             100 AD to 800 AD

Wari:                                                                                                 600 to 1000 AD

Cahokia: Illinois/St. Louis                                                           600 to 1400 AD

Sican                                                                                                  750 to 1375 AD 

Chimu                                                                                                1100 to 1470 AD

 

 

 

  

No comments:

Post a Comment