Report on Fox News says Ahmadinjad wants to purge liberal teachers from colleges and return to 80’s style radicalism.
Somewhat inexact reporting. Undefined terminology from an Iranian perspective: liberal and 80’s style radicalism. In Iran, what do those words mean? We are not sure what liberal and radicalism is in this country or political entity, as it be.
Take the term terrorism. Take it, please. This overused term could be replaced by other terms allowing for more species under the generic term terrorist extending to those who merely disagree to common street thugs who blow up things for fun.
Here are possible substitutes: street criminals, organized crime, political factions, ethnic factions, business factions, juntas, religious factions, vengeance seekers, the patriotic, the unemployed…Have you more ideas? We can talk to these people! Nobody has the right to tell us whom we can talk to at anytime or anywhere. In an increasingly distasteful outcome, we must begin talks on neutral ground chosen by all who send a delegation.
Negotiations rather than pullouts for now. We must begin somewhere.
Was overheated rhetoric necessary considering recent successes? Or is it only reported as such? Is there a need for a Press secretary? More secularism, an indistinct term for sure. A university in the ancient sense would contain science and philosophy from the known universe. Human life was never ordered to be frozen in time. Let the people choose through knowledge rather than the lack thereof. Are you macho enough to try this?
Life changes as we long for the security of the past while we struggle against the unknown or embrace the innovative. Take your choice but the past is gone forever.
Shall men and women discuss the future?
Thursday, September 07, 2006
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
LETTER TO RTA
After receiving a rejection to be on the citizens accountability for regional transportation committee, I wrote a brief note to Gary Hayes, Executive Director of the Regional Transportation Authority.....
Dear Mr. Hayes:
Thank you for your kind consideration for the CART Committee. It is gratifying to know that so many concerned citizens applied.
After perusing your website, I could not locate information concerning these chosen committee members. It would be illuminating to augment the list you sent to me, providing more knowledge about the chosen candidates, who appear to be mostly men. I would like to know each candidate’s affiliation and employer, plus their special qualifications to be members. This sunshine would be good for the RTA project, since many citizens are interested in the implementation of this massive amount of funding derived from a tax increase.
I am interested in membership in the Citizen Advisory Committees. Remember that a variety of viewpoints will provide a more equitable result when implementing any plan.
I will be looking forward to the posting of further data concerning the committee members. You are part of the government and truth in government is desired by all. This information would dispel any rumors that special interests dominate the RTA.
Dear Mr. Hayes:
Thank you for your kind consideration for the CART Committee. It is gratifying to know that so many concerned citizens applied.
After perusing your website, I could not locate information concerning these chosen committee members. It would be illuminating to augment the list you sent to me, providing more knowledge about the chosen candidates, who appear to be mostly men. I would like to know each candidate’s affiliation and employer, plus their special qualifications to be members. This sunshine would be good for the RTA project, since many citizens are interested in the implementation of this massive amount of funding derived from a tax increase.
I am interested in membership in the Citizen Advisory Committees. Remember that a variety of viewpoints will provide a more equitable result when implementing any plan.
I will be looking forward to the posting of further data concerning the committee members. You are part of the government and truth in government is desired by all. This information would dispel any rumors that special interests dominate the RTA.
Thursday, August 31, 2006
Interference in Local Elections
To the National Republican Congressional Committee:
To quote the Arizona Daily Star August 31, 2006, “In a highly unorthodox move, national Republicans have decided to spend more than $122,000 on primary race television ads endorsing Steve Huffman for Congress”.
Tell me this is not true! Do you know who you are supporting? Steve Huffman has a 57% attendance race in the Arizona Congress. He was a member of the Environmental Committee and managed to attend 4 out of 9 meetings. Anyone else would have been told not to come back if they had shirked their job to that degree. And now the National Republican Congressional Committee is attempting to forward Steve Huffman’s candidacy. This lack of attention to the elected position is of great concern to me. I want to support a candidate who will actually attend, not a candidate who only bothers to attend when he is pushing some special interest.
I reviewed the House Bills sponsored by Mr. Huffman and was not pleased with his agenda, which was mostly to provide tax breaks for special interests who have contributed to his campaigns. Since Mr. Huffman is a real estate broker, it did not surprise me that he was against a bill that would have forced any landowner to disclose a lack of water resources on land sold to unsuspecting buyers. Arizona is having problems coping with growth and groundwater resources are failing, according to Tucson Water. Mr. Huffman and his contributors appear relentless in setting things up for their own profits, while ignoring the public good and the possibility of water rationing if the Central Arizona Project water infusions to southern Arizona are decreased or even cut off due to a water shortfall in the Colorado River System.
Mr. Huffman apparently considers himself to be an Arizona constitutional expert, since he introduced 2 amendments to it during the last session. Both amendments were designed for special interests to circumvent current law and cater to the wealthy in a state where most people are not wealthy. Mr. Huffman has been reputed as saying that winning an election is all about money and that the candidate with the most money wins. Currently, about 40% of Mr. Huffman’s campaign contributions are from those who profit from real estate sales, while the average home price in Arizona has climbed to the point where many people are left permanently landless due to an inability to pay the inflated prices. We do not need further negative influence in our economy that results in impoverishment and possible social unrest.
Mr. Huffman also exhibits a lack of respect for the vote. He introduced HB 2702, the Rio Nuevo extension. Rio Nuevo is a special tax district within Tucson that was enabled by a popular vote that allowed for matching funds to be contributed by the city of Tucson, which amounts to about $750,000 a month for city to pay in return to tax rebates to be used for downtown renovation. Mr. Huffman did not believe this 12 year extension of the Rio Nuevo tax obligation needed another vote, while I feel that the voters should have been able to OK further expenditures, and possibly not be forced to pay and pay for special upscale interests downtown. Tucson is not a rich city. Homelessness is pervasive, the crime rate is high, and the police are seriously understaffed, yet this $750,000 a month is earmarked by HB 2702 for 12 more years. We should have had the right to vote on this expenditure, but thanks to Mr. Huffman and his contributors and an apparent vote trading scheme that benefited telecommunications companies, Rio Nuevo is siphoning needed funds from the city’s coffers. This is despotism and corruption from the top down and we certainly don’t need this kind of attitude in Washington D.C.
Mr. Huffman was also supporting the Regional Transportation Authority bond election and a large portion of the work proposed will heavily benefit Diamond Ventures, a powerful campaign donor to Mr. Huffman. Scandal swirled around this election. The pro RTA committee bought 22 spots in the election literature mailed out to voters, but took credit for only two, which left voters thinking those people had actually paid for expressing their opinions, when they had been subsidized by the pro RTA committee. I believe this was voter information fraud but the pro RTA committee people shrugged it off as an oversight.
I do hope you reconsider this interference in Arizona elections. The locals know their candidates and you are apparently unaware of the issues facing Arizona or you would not be propping up this candidate. If you have accepted a huge donation in return for this support, then please review your priorities. This kind of candidate is why the Republican Party is in trouble. Mr. Huffman is definitely not a moderate in any sense of the word. He is beholden to the wealthy and is ignoring the needs of the majority of the populace. Somebody needs to research Mr. Huffman’s campaign donations due to the repetitive nature of donations from several sources, which may or may not have been coerced as a condition of employment. Perhaps some phone calls are in order.
At a recent Candidates’ Breakfast hosted by Tucson Republican Women, Mr. Huffman made a poor showing and was heavily criticized for negative campaigning. Did you do any real research before making the decision to infuse $122,000 into Mr. Huffman’s moribund campaign? I protest this interference in our election.
To quote the Arizona Daily Star August 31, 2006, “In a highly unorthodox move, national Republicans have decided to spend more than $122,000 on primary race television ads endorsing Steve Huffman for Congress”.
Tell me this is not true! Do you know who you are supporting? Steve Huffman has a 57% attendance race in the Arizona Congress. He was a member of the Environmental Committee and managed to attend 4 out of 9 meetings. Anyone else would have been told not to come back if they had shirked their job to that degree. And now the National Republican Congressional Committee is attempting to forward Steve Huffman’s candidacy. This lack of attention to the elected position is of great concern to me. I want to support a candidate who will actually attend, not a candidate who only bothers to attend when he is pushing some special interest.
I reviewed the House Bills sponsored by Mr. Huffman and was not pleased with his agenda, which was mostly to provide tax breaks for special interests who have contributed to his campaigns. Since Mr. Huffman is a real estate broker, it did not surprise me that he was against a bill that would have forced any landowner to disclose a lack of water resources on land sold to unsuspecting buyers. Arizona is having problems coping with growth and groundwater resources are failing, according to Tucson Water. Mr. Huffman and his contributors appear relentless in setting things up for their own profits, while ignoring the public good and the possibility of water rationing if the Central Arizona Project water infusions to southern Arizona are decreased or even cut off due to a water shortfall in the Colorado River System.
Mr. Huffman apparently considers himself to be an Arizona constitutional expert, since he introduced 2 amendments to it during the last session. Both amendments were designed for special interests to circumvent current law and cater to the wealthy in a state where most people are not wealthy. Mr. Huffman has been reputed as saying that winning an election is all about money and that the candidate with the most money wins. Currently, about 40% of Mr. Huffman’s campaign contributions are from those who profit from real estate sales, while the average home price in Arizona has climbed to the point where many people are left permanently landless due to an inability to pay the inflated prices. We do not need further negative influence in our economy that results in impoverishment and possible social unrest.
Mr. Huffman also exhibits a lack of respect for the vote. He introduced HB 2702, the Rio Nuevo extension. Rio Nuevo is a special tax district within Tucson that was enabled by a popular vote that allowed for matching funds to be contributed by the city of Tucson, which amounts to about $750,000 a month for city to pay in return to tax rebates to be used for downtown renovation. Mr. Huffman did not believe this 12 year extension of the Rio Nuevo tax obligation needed another vote, while I feel that the voters should have been able to OK further expenditures, and possibly not be forced to pay and pay for special upscale interests downtown. Tucson is not a rich city. Homelessness is pervasive, the crime rate is high, and the police are seriously understaffed, yet this $750,000 a month is earmarked by HB 2702 for 12 more years. We should have had the right to vote on this expenditure, but thanks to Mr. Huffman and his contributors and an apparent vote trading scheme that benefited telecommunications companies, Rio Nuevo is siphoning needed funds from the city’s coffers. This is despotism and corruption from the top down and we certainly don’t need this kind of attitude in Washington D.C.
Mr. Huffman was also supporting the Regional Transportation Authority bond election and a large portion of the work proposed will heavily benefit Diamond Ventures, a powerful campaign donor to Mr. Huffman. Scandal swirled around this election. The pro RTA committee bought 22 spots in the election literature mailed out to voters, but took credit for only two, which left voters thinking those people had actually paid for expressing their opinions, when they had been subsidized by the pro RTA committee. I believe this was voter information fraud but the pro RTA committee people shrugged it off as an oversight.
I do hope you reconsider this interference in Arizona elections. The locals know their candidates and you are apparently unaware of the issues facing Arizona or you would not be propping up this candidate. If you have accepted a huge donation in return for this support, then please review your priorities. This kind of candidate is why the Republican Party is in trouble. Mr. Huffman is definitely not a moderate in any sense of the word. He is beholden to the wealthy and is ignoring the needs of the majority of the populace. Somebody needs to research Mr. Huffman’s campaign donations due to the repetitive nature of donations from several sources, which may or may not have been coerced as a condition of employment. Perhaps some phone calls are in order.
At a recent Candidates’ Breakfast hosted by Tucson Republican Women, Mr. Huffman made a poor showing and was heavily criticized for negative campaigning. Did you do any real research before making the decision to infuse $122,000 into Mr. Huffman’s moribund campaign? I protest this interference in our election.
Monday, August 28, 2006
Blow a Wedge Out of The World
Who is it that wants to test atomic weapons in such an unstable geologic region as the Sea of Japan that extends all the way to the South China Sea that intersects with the area of the huge tsunami quake off Indonesia? He needs to look at a hologram of earthquake areas of the Earth, ocean trenches and fault lines before he lines up a blow to end all blows. He might be on the piece that becomes a meteorite on Venus.
Other earthquake prone areas take heed. Qum is not the first quake and will not be the last, if we can go by past geologic events and tumbled cities dust between your anointed toes. You old catamount shrewd enough to state such, speak up. The welfare of the region is no doubt in your thought processes. Academic learning and wizard dignity heed the call to peace.
Somebody needs to pay the Palestinians so should it be the descendents of all on the United Nations Security Council who decided on the creation of Zionistic Israel, plus the nation of Israel must make some reparations to these people also. How about an apology from those responsible? Beware of inflation that makes cash worth less every day as you have to pay more for the same thing, hopefully not unto a survival level. An apology would be both priceless and worthless unless it brings peace. A lump sum might make more sense and would get the economy moving. Commerce is what Israel needs, not subsidies.
“Eat, drink and be merry” quoth Shakespeare like he lived now in these dangerous times. Legalize the Baath Party and call for new elections while some of the chieftans are moving towards peace. Unite the Bloods and Crips and Banditos wow let’s try that. Even they would see a common good. Iran can influence the Shia or is Al Sadr not talking to them or what? Internecine squabbling for intangible rewards? People are dying. We need to talk to these people now. Can Saddam stop it?
If North Korea blows a wedge out of the world or makes that crack in the world bigger and Japan is sweeping seaweed off the mountaintops, then I guess all the talk was a waste of time.
Other earthquake prone areas take heed. Qum is not the first quake and will not be the last, if we can go by past geologic events and tumbled cities dust between your anointed toes. You old catamount shrewd enough to state such, speak up. The welfare of the region is no doubt in your thought processes. Academic learning and wizard dignity heed the call to peace.
Somebody needs to pay the Palestinians so should it be the descendents of all on the United Nations Security Council who decided on the creation of Zionistic Israel, plus the nation of Israel must make some reparations to these people also. How about an apology from those responsible? Beware of inflation that makes cash worth less every day as you have to pay more for the same thing, hopefully not unto a survival level. An apology would be both priceless and worthless unless it brings peace. A lump sum might make more sense and would get the economy moving. Commerce is what Israel needs, not subsidies.
“Eat, drink and be merry” quoth Shakespeare like he lived now in these dangerous times. Legalize the Baath Party and call for new elections while some of the chieftans are moving towards peace. Unite the Bloods and Crips and Banditos wow let’s try that. Even they would see a common good. Iran can influence the Shia or is Al Sadr not talking to them or what? Internecine squabbling for intangible rewards? People are dying. We need to talk to these people now. Can Saddam stop it?
If North Korea blows a wedge out of the world or makes that crack in the world bigger and Japan is sweeping seaweed off the mountaintops, then I guess all the talk was a waste of time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)