At home with a bad cold while missing a fun meeting, I
watched the Bengazi Hearings chaired very competently by Rep. Trey Gowdy. After Rep. Gowdy’s thought provoking opening
statement, I was prepared to listen and learn from the well prepared questions
formed by the committee members.
As I listened, several things became clear. Most of the Democrats were ill prepared and
obviously had not done what the committee was charged to do because they ‘believed’
poor little Hillary was being victimized because she dared to run for president. I don’t care what their ‘beliefs’ were, they
should have formulated questions that brought out the truth. I applaud Rep. Duckworth on her devotion to
duty and of her carefully prepared questions concerning security and
backup. She did not waste her time on
emotional and belligerent displays against the charge of the committee, as did
others. A clear dereliction of duty was
obvious among Democrat committee members who were ill prepared with questions
and choose to pontificate instead. I
hope they are voted out in the next election they face.
The interest in Sidney Blumenthal was phenomenal, but was unfortunately
divided along partisan lines, with the Democrats asking no questions about
Sidney Blumenthal. Why not?
Who is Sidney Blumenthal?
Described as a well-paid sycophant and author, he has written books with
titles like: The Strange
Death of Republican America: Chronicles of a Collapsing Party, and The Clinton Wars, among others.
He protected the Clintons from the Lewinski scandal and has been a close
friend for years. Mr. Blumenthal is a
vicious partisan with a history of conspiracy theories who apparently had Mrs.
Clinton’s ear, particularly about Libya.
It has
been suggested that the overthrow of Kaddafi was orchestrated by the UN and the
Clinton State Department in order to accommodate business interests in Libya. I hope such a cynical conclusion is not
proven. Sidney Blumenthal was
forwarding the business interests of contractors interested in Libya who possibly hired Mr.
Blumenthal to represent them because he had access to Mrs. Clinton. Did money change hands over this? Was Mr. Blumenthal selling access?
Mr.
Blumenthal received $10,000 a month from the Clinton Foundation, where his
duties were problematical, which was also during the time of the Bengazi
tragedy and during his tenure working for the supporters of the Hillary
campaign for president. How much income
did all this work generate? Was he
working for the contractors hoping for projects in Libya or was he just doing
that for free? This guy looks like he
was being paid for three jobs at once.
Apparently at least some of the e mails sent
to Mrs. Clinton by Mr. Blumenthal made their way to Ambassador Stevens. Did Ambassador Stevens receive fallacious
information? Did he believe this
information?
It’s
nice to know what kind of people are hired by the Clinton Foundation at the
behest of Bill Clinton. I hope all the
donors take note. Sidney Blumenthal’s
son, Max Blumenthal has expressed many biased opinions concerning the Middle
East, including opinions that possibly generate income for the Clinton Foundation
from wealthy families hostile to Israel.
Of course, Sidney Blumenthal is promoting his son’s career.
This
Sidney Blumenthal was too radical for the Obama Administration, who rejected
him as an employee. Yet Mrs. Clinton
gave him access anyway to an inner circle of influence that never should have
existed. The official channels of the
White House, Military and others should have taken precedence over any non-vetted
person. Mr. Blumenthal had been vetted
and rejected as an employee, yet Mrs. Clinton continued his influence, even to
the point of redacting his name from e mails he sent her and forwarding them to
the state department and possibly Ambassador Stevens.
I saw
a clip on Fox News this morning that described a meeting held three weeks
before Ambassador Steven’s death. The conclusions
of this security and operations meeting were that the Ambassador’s outpost
should be consolidated with the CIA headquarters for security reasons and that
the situation was untenable as it was.
Mrs.
Clinton sat there and said that nobody called for any changes at the Bengazi
facility so things continued. Did she
read the memo or even attend the meeting or receive a report from somebody at
the meeting? Did she know about this
consolidation request? Where was her
leadership? Why didn’t she make the move
to close it down, instead of waiting for ‘underlings’ to suggest it? IT WAS HER DUTY TO KNOW ABOUT ALL OF THE
EMBASSIES WITH SECURITY RISKS AND IT WAS HER DUTY TO CLOSE IT DOWN OR REINFORCE
SECURITY IN THE FACE OF ESCALATING THREATS.
The
hearing was definitely illuminating, just not in the way some had
envisioned. I do resent the spurious
attitude on the part of the intensely partisan Democrats who tried to sabotage
the hearing with critical comments about other members of the committee or
about partisan politics in general. The
lack of professionalism on the part of the Democrats with the exception of Rep.
Duckworth, was an indicator of what is wrong in Washington these days.
The
fiercely partisan politics of Sidney Blumenthal and the Clintons has damaged
the climate in Washington to the point that the naysayers and the dividers are
controlling and nothing gets done. Votes
are held in secret and their top presidential candidate Hillary Clinton
declares that Republicans are enemies, something even Vice President Biden
disavows. The country cannot afford any
more influence from the likes of Sidney Blumenthal, Bill and Hillary Clinton
and the corruption and divisiveness they represent.
No comments:
Post a Comment