TAXATION AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Communication with others produced a new idea. According to a source, it is possible to tax banks, but that is a state responsibility.
Can the legislature take charge and tax foreclosures and repossessions? Not a tax on the poor guy who just lost his home or investment! How about a tax on the repossessors,; instead of giving them a fat tax break on the homes and businesses they repossess? They end up with a tax advantage and physical possession of the properties, a good deal for them and a bad deal for the rest of the community.
The foreclosure policy could also be implemented as a fee. How about a fee on every repossession and foreclosure, payable by the lienholder? The courts and administrative offices could raise fees on the lienholders foreclosing and repossessing. The police and fire could have a non-refundable contingency fee on empty homes and commercial property and require a monthly list of foreclosures and repossessions, plus cash payment for each at time of filing.
The reasons for instituting new fees and taxes on lienholders foreclosing on and repossessing properties should be stated:
Foreclosures and Repossessions contribute heavily to:
Homelessness
Increases in public housing costs
Increases in bankruptcy rates
Neighborhood blight and vandalism
Increases in welfare rolls
Increases in state health care costs
These foreclosures and repossessions are damaging the social fabric of our town. Community resources have to take care of the people ousted from their homes and businesses after the lienholders are through with them. Homes and jobs are lost as a result of bank policies. Foreclosed homes are even sold for less than the original buyer could have now paid. How about appraisal fraud on homes, like the false appraisals on 'derivatives'? Social responsibility can be maintained through taxes and laws.
This fee or tax money from the lienholders could be divvied up among the state and communities. This is a tax people would support! Sock it to the banks!
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Thursday, June 03, 2010
NEW REVENUE SOURCE
In thinking about the need for new revenue for the city, my mind landed on the banks, who are rolling in cash. I have several questions about the banks and the foreclosures and the taxes on the foreclosed properties.
In several places I have seen case histories of those who lost their properties through foreclosure, then were charged taxes on these properties even though they could no longer had access to the properties. Taxes apparently accumulated long after they were ousted by foreclosure.
My question is this: Where are the taxes on foreclosed homes? The lenders foreclosing should be liable for the taxes, since they ousted the inhabitants and claimed possession of the property in fact. They claim the property, they own the taxes also? If you buy a property, you assume the liens which must be dealt with at time of purchase. The taxes should be assumed by the banks, since they take defacto possession of the foreclosed properties.
How much money could be generated by making the lenders pay taxes on the foreclosed properties?
The cities, towns and states could use this owed tax money, which should be paid by the defacto owner, not held in limbo by a paper technicality that allows the banks to stick the prior owners with the taxes, who now must struggle with this added debt after they lose possession of the property, that held fraudulent appraisals in the first place. The banks should step up and pay the taxes and penalties they owe on the properties they seized.
Pass some more penalties and tax the lenders for every empty home they own in this community. If they were taxed, maybe they would cut the rent or prices and get people in the houses. Empty homes in this community should cost those big owners some money.
Our governments need the money.
In several places I have seen case histories of those who lost their properties through foreclosure, then were charged taxes on these properties even though they could no longer had access to the properties. Taxes apparently accumulated long after they were ousted by foreclosure.
My question is this: Where are the taxes on foreclosed homes? The lenders foreclosing should be liable for the taxes, since they ousted the inhabitants and claimed possession of the property in fact. They claim the property, they own the taxes also? If you buy a property, you assume the liens which must be dealt with at time of purchase. The taxes should be assumed by the banks, since they take defacto possession of the foreclosed properties.
How much money could be generated by making the lenders pay taxes on the foreclosed properties?
The cities, towns and states could use this owed tax money, which should be paid by the defacto owner, not held in limbo by a paper technicality that allows the banks to stick the prior owners with the taxes, who now must struggle with this added debt after they lose possession of the property, that held fraudulent appraisals in the first place. The banks should step up and pay the taxes and penalties they owe on the properties they seized.
Pass some more penalties and tax the lenders for every empty home they own in this community. If they were taxed, maybe they would cut the rent or prices and get people in the houses. Empty homes in this community should cost those big owners some money.
Our governments need the money.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Tucson Employment or more Unemployment and debt?
So I learned much about this city since returning here a few years ago. Ready to compare with what I had seen in other communities to my hometown, I engaged in political activity, mainly in the form of attending political functions and listening.
Factions have been squabbling over the spoils from the failed Rio Nuevo projects and very few have taken money from the many and then given to favorites. Too much money has been spent on too little. A few made big bucks and too many are unemployed.
The latest boondoggle is to buy streetcars from Oregon, putting them to work while our own people are unemployed. And they want to borrow money to do it, laying heavy amounts of debt service on Arizona people in order to hire people in Oregon to build streetcars we don't need.
Adding more debt to the public load already in place is foolish in this economic climate. Rio Nuevo is $2,000,000 in deficit a year, owing that much more than they bring in while they feverishly try to set up yet another debt for the city to guarantee to build a hotel downtown. Occupancy rates downtown are about 50%, which is too low for another hotel to be built. Can you believe Shelko wants to borrow money, hold enough to make payments for x years and is planning on a high occupancy rate to pay for the hotel? What are the occupancy rates right now? What is the intake of the TIF revenue right now? What is the present take of TCC? We need a dose of reality.
The city is $33,000,000 in deficit but just borrowed more money to build a building when empty buildings stand all over town. This new debt adds to the debt load.
Now an 'emergency' meeting was called to bring RTA into the money pit downtown in order to adequately fund this modern streetcar project. A huge portion of this money will not bring jobs to Tucson, except in the form of benefit to the few merchants along the very short route and the developer at the end of it. How much of this proposed debt, the federal grant and the city and RTA contributions will actually stay here to fund local jobs?
What percent is debt service? Sales tax revenue is not predictable as a revenue source when compared to the steady drain of debt service on the local economy.
What percent will be spent in Oregon on streetcars built by people who boycott us?
We do not need this project. We already have roads to all of these places. Let's use them.
We need small scale local jobs funded without debt. Instead of a giant museum all at once, we build a wing.
Factions have been squabbling over the spoils from the failed Rio Nuevo projects and very few have taken money from the many and then given to favorites. Too much money has been spent on too little. A few made big bucks and too many are unemployed.
The latest boondoggle is to buy streetcars from Oregon, putting them to work while our own people are unemployed. And they want to borrow money to do it, laying heavy amounts of debt service on Arizona people in order to hire people in Oregon to build streetcars we don't need.
Adding more debt to the public load already in place is foolish in this economic climate. Rio Nuevo is $2,000,000 in deficit a year, owing that much more than they bring in while they feverishly try to set up yet another debt for the city to guarantee to build a hotel downtown. Occupancy rates downtown are about 50%, which is too low for another hotel to be built. Can you believe Shelko wants to borrow money, hold enough to make payments for x years and is planning on a high occupancy rate to pay for the hotel? What are the occupancy rates right now? What is the intake of the TIF revenue right now? What is the present take of TCC? We need a dose of reality.
The city is $33,000,000 in deficit but just borrowed more money to build a building when empty buildings stand all over town. This new debt adds to the debt load.
Now an 'emergency' meeting was called to bring RTA into the money pit downtown in order to adequately fund this modern streetcar project. A huge portion of this money will not bring jobs to Tucson, except in the form of benefit to the few merchants along the very short route and the developer at the end of it. How much of this proposed debt, the federal grant and the city and RTA contributions will actually stay here to fund local jobs?
What percent is debt service? Sales tax revenue is not predictable as a revenue source when compared to the steady drain of debt service on the local economy.
What percent will be spent in Oregon on streetcars built by people who boycott us?
We do not need this project. We already have roads to all of these places. Let's use them.
We need small scale local jobs funded without debt. Instead of a giant museum all at once, we build a wing.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
SB 1070 Arizona and Illegal Immigration
ARIZONA AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
Senate Bill 1070 was passed by the Arizona House and Senate and signed by Governor Brewer, drawing both criticism and praise within the state.
Police officers will be made responsible for checking immigration status as well as given the power to stop people who might be illegal immigrants to check their papers. In the hands of a repressive police force, this law is dangerous.
On a practical level, I don't think the cops are interested in repressing or hassling anybody and that they now have plenty to do managing public safety concerns. The role of local police in our society has been to maintain order.
In order to maintain order, several criteria must be enforced:
• Traffic safety
• Immediate violence prevention
• Investigations into violence
• Enforcing court orders
This maintains continuity and consequences and preserves the fabric of our society.
The attitudes that created this law, will not be solved by this law. Let us think about Mexico and the Cartels for a while. There are a few facts on this that should be noted:
• Increasing violence in Mexico against police and Federales
• Rival factions in Mexico are competing for a market share of the USA drug trade
• The Cartels are reported to have $$$$$
• Is the Mexican government in danger of falling?
• the last Mexican election was quite close, with the populist candidate losing
• Recession has caused Mexicans to return to Mexico from USA, losing income
• Mexico produces about 450,000 more people a year than they have jobs for.
• The USA as population outlet for Mexico has slowed down due to higher unemployment in the USA
• High unemployment or underemployment rates in Mexico
• The USA has a law giving citizenship to anyone born here
• Arizona/Mexico is part of an ancient migration route
• Hispanics settled in what is now Arizona during the 1500s
• Anglos settled in what is now Arizona mostly after 1850
Recent history needs to be reviewed:
• During the subprime boom, Developers and Builders dominated Arizona politically
• Large numbers of undocumented workers were hired by developers and builders
• Mexicans heard about the good jobs available and headed to the USA
• Cultural change caused by the influx of Hispanic workers upset some residents
• Existing medical and educational services are used by undocumented workers
• Resentment over undocumented workers rose as unemployment grew
• Violence from Mexico appears to be spilling over into the USA
• An Arizona rancher was killed on his own land, apparently by a trespasser from Mexico
• Drug cartels in Mexico continue to feed the demand for drugs in the USA
• Illegal immigrant apprehensions are down in Arizona as jobs became scarce
• Federal action on illegal immigration has been fragmented and ineffective
• Some politicians are asking for militarization of the USA/Mexico border
Is illegal immigration a public safety issue? The immigrants have criminals among them, like any other human group. The drug cartel violence, drop houses and coyotes give the Mexican nationals a bad reputation, but the reality is that most illegal immigrants are peaceful people trying to find work, have children in the USA and build a better life for themselves and their families. Many of them send money to Mexico in support of impoverished relatives. Some of them ask for medical help and they all send their children to school. These human needs cost money to fulfill and the state of Arizona is bankrupt. Don't wait for the government of Mexico to offer to help pay for these services their citizens are receiving while in the USA: no money has ever been sent to pay for these services or needs, although the money the illegals send home to Mexico is certainly welcome.
So we have a situation where the impoverished come to the USA to work, their presence utilizes state services, but no sovereign entity is picking up the extra cost. Therein lies the resentment. Mexico and the USA should refund the cost of these services to Arizona and the other states taking care of undocumented immigrants. WE NEED THE MONEY.
As for SB 1070, I regret the perceived need for such a law on the part of lawmakers. Law enforcement should be able to concentrate on public safety issues. It is increasingly obvious that immigration reform is needed on the federal level, whether or not special interests oppose action. This election year politicians are finally talking reform.
It is about time!
Senate Bill 1070 was passed by the Arizona House and Senate and signed by Governor Brewer, drawing both criticism and praise within the state.
Police officers will be made responsible for checking immigration status as well as given the power to stop people who might be illegal immigrants to check their papers. In the hands of a repressive police force, this law is dangerous.
On a practical level, I don't think the cops are interested in repressing or hassling anybody and that they now have plenty to do managing public safety concerns. The role of local police in our society has been to maintain order.
In order to maintain order, several criteria must be enforced:
• Traffic safety
• Immediate violence prevention
• Investigations into violence
• Enforcing court orders
This maintains continuity and consequences and preserves the fabric of our society.
The attitudes that created this law, will not be solved by this law. Let us think about Mexico and the Cartels for a while. There are a few facts on this that should be noted:
• Increasing violence in Mexico against police and Federales
• Rival factions in Mexico are competing for a market share of the USA drug trade
• The Cartels are reported to have $$$$$
• Is the Mexican government in danger of falling?
• the last Mexican election was quite close, with the populist candidate losing
• Recession has caused Mexicans to return to Mexico from USA, losing income
• Mexico produces about 450,000 more people a year than they have jobs for.
• The USA as population outlet for Mexico has slowed down due to higher unemployment in the USA
• High unemployment or underemployment rates in Mexico
• The USA has a law giving citizenship to anyone born here
• Arizona/Mexico is part of an ancient migration route
• Hispanics settled in what is now Arizona during the 1500s
• Anglos settled in what is now Arizona mostly after 1850
Recent history needs to be reviewed:
• During the subprime boom, Developers and Builders dominated Arizona politically
• Large numbers of undocumented workers were hired by developers and builders
• Mexicans heard about the good jobs available and headed to the USA
• Cultural change caused by the influx of Hispanic workers upset some residents
• Existing medical and educational services are used by undocumented workers
• Resentment over undocumented workers rose as unemployment grew
• Violence from Mexico appears to be spilling over into the USA
• An Arizona rancher was killed on his own land, apparently by a trespasser from Mexico
• Drug cartels in Mexico continue to feed the demand for drugs in the USA
• Illegal immigrant apprehensions are down in Arizona as jobs became scarce
• Federal action on illegal immigration has been fragmented and ineffective
• Some politicians are asking for militarization of the USA/Mexico border
Is illegal immigration a public safety issue? The immigrants have criminals among them, like any other human group. The drug cartel violence, drop houses and coyotes give the Mexican nationals a bad reputation, but the reality is that most illegal immigrants are peaceful people trying to find work, have children in the USA and build a better life for themselves and their families. Many of them send money to Mexico in support of impoverished relatives. Some of them ask for medical help and they all send their children to school. These human needs cost money to fulfill and the state of Arizona is bankrupt. Don't wait for the government of Mexico to offer to help pay for these services their citizens are receiving while in the USA: no money has ever been sent to pay for these services or needs, although the money the illegals send home to Mexico is certainly welcome.
So we have a situation where the impoverished come to the USA to work, their presence utilizes state services, but no sovereign entity is picking up the extra cost. Therein lies the resentment. Mexico and the USA should refund the cost of these services to Arizona and the other states taking care of undocumented immigrants. WE NEED THE MONEY.
As for SB 1070, I regret the perceived need for such a law on the part of lawmakers. Law enforcement should be able to concentrate on public safety issues. It is increasingly obvious that immigration reform is needed on the federal level, whether or not special interests oppose action. This election year politicians are finally talking reform.
It is about time!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)